ELECTRON MICROSCOPY


Sample

AdhE spirosome

Specimen Preperation
Sample Aggregation State FILAMENT
Vitrification Instrument FEI VITROBOT MARK IV
Cryogen Name ETHANE
Sample Vitrification Details Vitification was performed on CFlat 1.2/1.3 300 mesh holey carbon grids with copper support.
3D Reconstruction
Reconstruction Method HELICAL
Number of Particles 95407
Reported Resolution (Å) 4.07
Resolution Method FSC 0.143 CUT-OFF
Other Details Overall resolution 4.07 angstrom as estimated by the masked gold-standard FSC = 0.143 criterion in cryoSPARC. Unmasked FSC values are lower, consistent with expected effects of masking." in the details field.
Refinement Type
Symmetry Type HELICAL
Map-Model Fitting and Refinement
ID 1
Refinement Space ?
Refinement Protocol RIGID BODY FIT
Refinement Target ?
Overall B Value ?
Fitting Procedure ?
Details A existing structure's (PDB:8UHW) coordinates were relaxed using the Rosetta Fast Relax algorithm and refined against the EM density from cryoSPARC using Phenix and Coot. Histidine residues coordinate the iron ion; short distances flagged as clashes correspond to metal coordination geometry.
Data Acquisition
Detector Type GATAN K3 (6k x 4k)
Electron Dose (electrons/Å2) 48
Imaging Experiment
Date of Experiment ?
Temprature (Kelvin)
Microscope Model TFS KRIOS
Minimum Defocus (nm) 100
Maximum Defocus (nm) 500
Minimum Tilt Angle (degrees) ?
Maximum Tilt Angle (degrees) ?
Nominal CS ?
Imaging Mode BRIGHT FIELD
Specimen Holder Model ?
Nominal Magnification 130000
Calibrated Magnification ?
Source FIELD EMISSION GUN
Acceleration Voltage (kV) 300
Imaging Details ?
Imaging Experiment
Task Software Package Version
PARTICLE SELECTION cryoSPARC 4.4.1
CTF CORRECTION cryoSPARC 4.4.1
MODEL FITTING Coot 0.9.8.96
INITIAL EULER ASSIGNMENT cryoSPARC 4.4.1
FINAL EULER ASSIGNMENT cryoSPARC 4.4.1
RECONSTRUCTION cryoSPARC 4.4.1
MODEL REFINEMENT PHENIX 2.0-5936
Image Processing
CTF Correction Type CTF Correction Details Number of Particles Selected Particle Selection Details
NONE ?
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback