SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1.25 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CI-MPR domain5-1, 10 mM [U-2H] bis-tris-2, 150 mM sodium chloride-3, 8 mM N-acetylglucosaminyl 6-phosphomethylmannoside-4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.5 AMBIENT 308
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1.25 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CI-MPR domain5-1, 10 mM [U-2H] bis-tris-2, 150 mM sodium chloride-3, 8 mM N-acetylglucosaminyl 6-phosphomethylmannoside-4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.5 AMBIENT 308
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 1.25 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CI-MPR domain5-1, 10 mM [U-2H] bis-tris-2, 150 mM sodium chloride-3, 8 mM N-acetylglucosaminyl 6-phosphomethylmannoside-4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.5 AMBIENT 308
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 2325 NOE CONSTRAINTS (416 INTRA, 546 SEQUENTIAL, 271 MEDIUM, and 1092 LONG RANGE) AND 189 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. AUTHOR STATES THAT THE DATA WAS COLLECTED IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH RECEPTOR AND LIGAND N-ACETYLGLUCOSAMINYL 6-PHOSPHOMETHYLMANNOSIDE. HOWEVER THE LIGAND COORDINATES WERE NOT REFINED AND THEREFORE NOT DEPOSITED 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker
3 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
4 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback