SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_13C,15N-SEPARATED_NOESY 1.0 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] mouse HBS1L N-terminal domain, 1.0 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Ubiquitin, 20 mM non sodium phosphate, 100 mM non NaCL, 0.02 % non NaN3, 90% H2O/10% D2O 120 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 1 298
2 3D CBCA(CO)NH,HNCACB 1.0 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] mouse HBS1L N-terminal domain, 1.0 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Ubiquitin, 20 mM non sodium phosphate, 100 mM non NaCL, 0.02 % non NaN3, 90% H2O/10% D2O 120 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 1 298
3 3D HCCH-COSY,TOCSY 1.0 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] mouse HBS1L N-terminal domain, 1.0 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Ubiquitin, 20 mM non sodium phosphate, 100 mM non NaCL, 0.02 % non NaN3, 90% H2O/10% D2O 120 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 1 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 24 Amber Case, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
2 structure calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
3 chemical shift assignment 0.863 KUJIRA N. Kobayashi, T. Kigawa, S. Yokoyama
4 peak picking 5.0.4 NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
5 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6 geometry optimization 2007 TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback