Home
About
Browse
Covid-19
Organism Classification
Alphafold Collection
Virus Classification
Indian Data
Documentation
Contact
Search Type
PDB Id
Uniprot Id
Source Organism
Host Organism
Protein Name
Method
Summary
Structure Feature
Experiment
Ligands & Environment
28YJ
pdb_000028yj
10.2210/pdb28yj/pdb
Download file
FASTA
PDB
MMCIF
Binary MMCIF
XML
Structure Factors
Full Validation Report
Validation File (XML)
Validation File (CIF)
FASTA Zipped(.gz)
PDB Zipped(.gz)
MMCIF Zipped(.gz)
Binary MMCIF Zipped(.gz)
Structure Factors Zipped(.gz)
Validation File Zipped (.xml.gz)
Validation File Zipped (.cif.gz)
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
Sample
Native chicken ZPD homopolymeric filament
Specimen Preperation
Sample Aggregation State
FILAMENT
Vitrification Instrument
?
Cryogen Name
NITROGEN
Sample Vitrification Details
?
3D Reconstruction
Reconstruction Method
SINGLE PARTICLE
Number of Particles
498339
Reported Resolution (Å)
4.60
Resolution Method
FSC 0.143 CUT-OFF
Other Details
?
Refinement Type
Symmetry Type
POINT
Map-Model Fitting and Refinement
ID
1
Refinement Space
REAL
Refinement Protocol
FLEXIBLE FIT
Refinement Target
?
Overall B Value
?
Fitting Procedure
?
Details
Model building was initiated using a local installation of AlphaFold 3 to predict a minimal filament fragment comprising one full-length subunit (chain A) and two partial subunits (chains B and C). The top-ranked prediction was rigid-body fitted into an initial 8.6 A-resolution map (postprocessed with EMReady2) using UCSF Chimera, followed by flexible fitting with Namdinator. Non-resolved terminal regions were trimmed, and well-defined N-glycan densities were manually built in Coot. The model was refined by real-space refinement in Phenix using NCS constraints and increased non-bonded interaction weights, followed by ADP refinement against the unsharpened map. This model served as a starting point for extension with an additional EGF and ZP-N domain from a fourth subunit (chain D). The extended model was docked into the present 4.6 A-resolution map, manually adjusted, and subjected to flexible fitting using the cryo-EM minimizer from cg2all; subsequently, it was refined using Refmac Servalcat task of CCP-EM Doppio, applying global NCS restraints, ProSMART-derived self-restraints, and increased non-bonded interaction weights. Following additional rounds of manual model rebuilding in Coot and real-space refinement in PHENIX (as described above), with positional refinement performed against a LocScale2-postprocessed map and ADP refinement against the unsharpened map, the model was validated using MolProbity and PHENIX. Note that the EGF domain of chain A (and, to a lesser extent, portions of its ZP-N domain near the postprocessed map boundary and the distal regions of the EGF domains in chains C and D) are weakly defined in the density, consistent with their elevated B-factors. These regions were retained in the model to preserve biological completeness, with their conformations constrained by NCS during refinement.
Data Acquisition
Detector Type
FEI FALCON IV (4k x 4k)
Electron Dose (electrons/Å
2
)
53
Imaging Experiment
Date of Experiment
?
Temprature (Kelvin)
Microscope Model
TFS KRIOS
Minimum Defocus (nm)
700
Maximum Defocus (nm)
2800
Minimum Tilt Angle (degrees)
?
Maximum Tilt Angle (degrees)
?
Nominal CS
2.7
Imaging Mode
BRIGHT FIELD
Specimen Holder Model
FEI TITAN KRIOS AUTOGRID HOLDER
Nominal Magnification
165000
Calibrated Magnification
?
Source
FIELD EMISSION GUN
Acceleration Voltage (kV)
300
Imaging Details
?
Imaging Experiment
Task
Software Package
Version
PARTICLE SELECTION
cryoSPARC
?
IMAGE ACQUISITION
EPU
?
MODEL FITTING
UCSF Chimera
?
MODEL FITTING
ISOLDE
?
MODEL FITTING
Coot
?
RECONSTRUCTION
cryoSPARC
?
RECONSTRUCTION
EMReady
?
MODEL REFINEMENT
REFMAC
?
MODEL REFINEMENT
Servalcat
?
MODEL REFINEMENT
PHENIX
2.0_5936
Image Processing
CTF Correction Type
CTF Correction Details
Number of Particles Selected
Particle Selection Details
PHASE FLIPPING AND AMPLITUDE CORRECTION
?
Feedback
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback
Submit